Subject	that's alright
Posted by	Marshall on October 12, 2002 at 8:29 PM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	I agree, but no time to reasearch your posts. posted by Chip(GinnMotorsports) on October 12, 2002 at 07:38 PM
Message	There are a lot of posts on here and it's hard to keep track of everyone's views of every product. Obviously I'm not against all performance parts, I just think that some are more effective than others, and some aren't effective enough to warrant the price in my opinion.
Follow Ups	What are the benefits of upgrading to a one-piece driveshaft (n/m) - twntrb13 10:18:26 10/12/02 Direct link, lighter weight, no carrier bearing. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 10:35:16 10/12/02 smoother transfer of power... - nixit(da][as) 11:45:54 10/12/02 i didn't notice much oh a change imo (n/m) - Red ZX 11:47:08 10/12/02 Dyno would show it. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 12:26:38 10/12/02 no it wouldn't - Marshall 12:55:26 10/12/02 Yes you would - ZBlacktt 13:43:03 10/12/02 I do not think you would - Marshall 17:30:17 10/12/02 Bro, I'm far older than you......lol - ZBlacktt 18:22:00 10/12/02 Then you've hit a mental plateau - Marshall 18:26:19 10/12/02 yawn...... (n/m) - ZBlacktt 18:32:06 10/12/02 pretty good comeback considering your capabilities. (n/m) - Marshall 18:32:57 10/12/02 No you just BORE me........ (n/m) - ZBlacktt 18:37:58 10/12/02 UD pulleys have been proven on the dyno to give 10+ rwhp - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 18:35:48 10/12/02 read my previous posts on ud pulleys - Marshall 18:40:42 10/12/02 I agree, but no time to reasearch your posts. - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 19:38:06 10/12/02 that's alright - Marshall 20:29:14 10/12/02 yup,..flywheels=~13rwhp,..proven (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 18:45:14 10/12/02 I'd be interested in seeing the proof on that one. - Marshall 18:57:31 10/12/02 i think greg has the dyno's for this one (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 19:15:33 10/12/02 i had 193 from intake and a fly. this ppl get that - HaloZ(SanAntonio) 04:22:35 10/13/02 It picks up chicks. (n/m) - J.R. (phx) 12:09:13 10/12/02 chicks dig The Shaft. (n/m) - Marshall 19:11:49 10/12/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.